top of page

Do School Budgets Shape Student Behavior?

  • Writer: Annika OMelia
    Annika OMelia
  • Mar 6
  • 9 min read

Updated: Mar 17

An Analysis of Rock Island’s Staffing and Spending


In recent months, concerns about student behavior at Rock Island High School have circulated widely in the community. Alongside those concerns, a number of theories have emerged about what might be driving the perceived changes in school climate.


One explanation that has surfaced repeatedly in my conversations is financial: the idea that district spending decisions—particularly the growth of administrative staffing—may have come at the expense of classroom instruction or student support services.


Because public schools rely on community trust, claims about financial mismanagement or an overly “top-heavy” administration deserve careful examination. These concerns have persisted in conversations around town and online, especially following the hiring of new district leadership.


Rather than speculate, I wanted to examine the district’s financial and staffing data directly to see what the numbers actually show.


This article is the first in a short series examining factors that may be influencing school climate in Rock Island. The focus of this first installment is staffing and personnel spending—two areas that can shape how schools function day-to-day.


To better understand how the district is structured and how resources are allocated, I reviewed several publicly available datasets, including:


  • The Rock Island–Milan School District Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) from 2018 through 2025

  • The Illinois Annual Financial Report (AFR)

  • The 2025 EIS Administrator and Teacher Salary and Benefits Report

  • The IMRF Compensation and Benefits Report for district staff earning more than $75,000


Together, these sources allow for analysis of several key indicators:

  • Full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing by category

  • Changes in staffing levels over time

  • Spending across major personnel categories

  • Changes in spending patterns over time

  • Compensation levels for leadership and instructional staff


Where useful, comparisons with Moline School District are included to provide regional context.


The goal is not to assign blame for complex issues like student behavior, which are influenced by many factors both inside and outside schools. Instead, this analysis aims to ground the conversation in verified data—helping clarify how the district is staffed, how resources are allocated, and whether common claims about administrative growth are supported by the numbers.


In future articles, I will explore other possible influences on school climate, including student support systems, discipline policy, and broader trends affecting schools nationwide.


Introduction

Before turning to the staffing and spending data, it is useful to review some basic information about the district from the 2025 CAFR and to place those figures in context by comparing them with Moline.


Description

Rock Island

Moline

Students

~6,292

~7,185

Tax Base

~526 Million

~1.1 Billion

Teachers

467

492

Administration

30 FTE

38 FTE

Teacher:Pupil Ratio

13.47

14.6

Free & Reduced Lunch

63%

59%

Cost Per Pupil

$13,722

$14,630

Average Teacher Pay

(coded as Teacher on salary report, not specials)

$82,277

$84,624

Source: 2025 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Rock Island Milan and Moline

Part 1: Rock Island Staffing Trends (2018–2025)


The CAFR includes a table titled “Full-Time Equivalent District Employees by Type,” which tracks staffing across major categories.


Rock Island FTE Staffing by Category

Year

Instruction

Student Services

Administration/Supervisory

Support Staff

2018

558

116

26

152

2019

563

122

26

165

2020

537

128

29

162

2021

540

132

28

153

2022

540

136

29

150

2023

546

134

29

162

2024

537

144

30

178

2025

537

144

30

178

Source: 2025 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Rock Island Milan


Instructional staff has decreased by ~ 20 FTE since 2018


Student services have grown by nearly 30 FTE since 2018


Administration has grown by 4 FTE since 2018


Support staff has grown by ~25 FTE


Because new district leadership came onboard in 2024, it is also useful to examine the most recent changes.


Rock Island FTE Change (2023 → 2025)

Category

2023

2024

2025

Change

Instruction

546

537

537

-9

Student Services

134

144

144

+10

Administration/Supervisory

29

30

30

+1

Support Staff

162

178

178

+16

Source: 2025 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Rock Island Milan


Between 2024 and 2025, the district’s overall staffing levels remained unchanged. However, more significant staffing changes occurred in FY2023, prior to the arrival of the new superintendent.


Of note, it is challenging to uncover how districts categorize each staff member. I recommend Rock Island adopt a more detailed FTE report in next year's CAFR like the one Moline School district uses.


Part 2: Rock Island Budget Trends (2019-2025)

Staffing patterns are only part of the picture. The CAFR also shows how the district allocates its budget.


Rock Island Milan Total Amount Per Year and as % of Total Budget

Year

Instruction ($)

Instruction %

Support Services ($)

Support %

Total Expenditures ($)

2018

$69,257,519

66.2%

$26,091,432

24.9%

$104,617,373

2019

$73,284,889

66.6%

$27,172,434

24.7%

$110,078,790

2020

$79,129,199

67.8%

$26,089,678

22.3%

$116,778,189

2021

$85,315,030

68.3%

$24,567,057

19.7%

$124,877,704

2022

$74,255,129

53.4%

$29,541,626

21.2%

$139,153,869

2023

$77,630,996

52.5%

$30,764,945

20.8%

$148,014,142

2024

$80,302,053

54.3%

$35,352,875

23.9%

$147,923,402

2025

$81,502,068

57.5%

$39,348,751

27.7%

$141,759,369


Over the past seven years:


  • Instruction spending increased from roughly $69 million to about $81 million.

  • Support services spending increased from roughly $26 million to about $39 million.

  • Instruction spending as a percentage of total dropped 8.7% while support service spending increased 2.8%. Other expenses like community services and debt are not shown here but also influence the percentages.


Because administrative costs are not explicitly separated in the CAFR report, it is challenging to nail down the exact administrative costs out of the Support Services bucket.


The Annual Financial Report (AFR) provides another perspective on the district’s finances. Instructional spending appears lower in this report because pension costs, which are included as expenditures in the CAFR, are removed from the AFR calculations. For FY2025, the AFR shows the following figures:


District

Instruction ($)

Instruction %

Support Services ($)

Support %

Total Direct Disbursement Expenditures

Rock Island

$54,917,676

63.21%

$24,205,332

27.86%

$86,879,559

Moline

$59,916,919

69.41%

$24,229,153

28.07%

$86,324,212

Source: 2025 Annual Financial Report for Rock Island Milan and Moline


As a percentage of direct disbursement expenditures, Moline is spending slightly more of the pie on instruction than is Rock Island.

Part 3: A Deeper Dive into Spending by Type


Instruction, Student Services, Support, Administration


Because the AFR and CAFR present spending at a relatively high level, I also reviewed additional personnel reports to better understand how staffing costs are distributed across the district. Each year the district submits an EIS Administrator and Teacher Salary and Benefits Report, as well as an IMRF Compensation and Benefits Report for employees earning more than $75,000. By filtering these reports in Excel, it is possible to approximate staffing costs by department. While neither report provides a complete picture of all district employees, they offer useful insight into compensation among higher-paid staff. It is also impossible to have staff positions line up between districts because each district uses slightly different labels.


EIS Administrator and Teacher Salary and Benefits Report


This report looks specifically at teachers and administrators.


Rock Island Milan School District

Role

Total

% of Total

Count

Average Salary

Administration (Superintendents, General Admin)

 $1,854,648.00

5%

13

 $142,665.00

Principals/Assistant Principals

$2,891,817.71

7%

23

 $125,731.00

Deans

$549,320.62

1%

5

 $ 109,864.00

Teacher/Special/Speech/Instruction/Supervisors

 $34,840,586.00

87%

422

 $ 82,560.00

Total

 $40,136,372.33

100%

463

 $ 460,820.00


Moline School District

Role

Total

% of Total

Count

Average

Salary

Administration (Superintendents, General Admin)

  $1,925,554.00  

5%

21

  $ 91,693.00  

Principals/Assistant Principals

 $2,524,231.00

6%

20

  $ 126,212.00  

Deans

 $509,036.00

1%

5

  $ 101,807.00  

Teacher/Special/Speech/Instruction

 $36,615,491.00

88%

456

  $ 80,297.00  

Total

  $41,574,312.00 

100%

502



IMRF Compensation and Benefits Report


The IMRF report looks at professionals like custodians, building maintenance, IT, the executive secretary, communications, payroll, human resources and other professionals who are not educators or educational administrators.


Rock Island Milan School District

Role

Positions

Average Salary

Information Tech

5

$87,488

Human Resources

2

$72,017

Communications

1

$79,515

Accounting/Payroll

4

$85,659

Athletic

2

$98,289

Building supervisor/Custodial

22

$57,453

Secretary/Clerical

7

$57,519

Misc (food, safety, nurse, driver)

8

$65,103


Moline School District

Role

Positions

Average Salary

Technology/IT

8

 $108,479.00

Human Resources

3

 $68,996.00

Public Relations

1

 $101,943.00

Payroll/Accounting Purchasing

5

 $74,492.00

Facilities/buildings/custodial

27

 $68,388.00

Administrative Assistant

8

 $63,076.00

Misc (PT, OT, Registrar)

5

 $82,249.00


Total Count and Spending for IMRF Report FY 2025

District

Positions

Total Spending

Rock Island

53

 $ 3,501,627.00

Moline

57

 $ 4,305,814.00

Difference

4

$804,187


Rock Island Milan Highest Compensation in Admin


Please not these figures reflect the actual amounts paid in 2025, not contract amounts. So, if someone only worked part of a year, only what they were paid will show up.


Name

Position

Base Salary

WILLIAMS, SHARON DENISE

100-District Superintendent

$220,846.15

DIXON, RAMONA B

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

$159,947.00

FRANTZ, DEBRA LYNN

121-Administrator in a Bilingual Education Program

$158,368.00

VANCE, WILLIAM SCOTT

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$156,054.89

DASE, JEFFREY

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$154,778.00

ALLEN, KRISTIN A

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

$147,860.00

CLARK, LANCE ROBERT

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

$147,860.00

WILLIAMS, LASHANTA

121-Administrator in a Bilingual Education Program

$147,860.00

MAAG, DORIAN DAWN

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

$141,475.00

ANDEDO, LORELEI ROCHELLE

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

$120,005.00

MOORE, DOMINIQUE P

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$106,168.65

COLBRESE, EGAN M

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$26,333.38

 

Total

$1,687,556.07


Moline Highest Compensation in Admin


Please not these figures reflect the actual amounts paid in 2025, not contract amounts. So, if someone only worked part of a year, only what they were paid will show up.


Name

Position

Base Salary

Savage, Rachel Marie

100-District Superintendent

$240,611.00

DeBaene, Matthew D

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$168,791.99

Prybil, Brian D

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$168,791.99

Sanders, Trista L

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$159,310.00

Gallo, Vincent P

114-Chief School Business Official

$154,125.00

DeTaeye, Todd J

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$153,081.16

Terstriep, Erin S

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$148,428.00

Peterson, Laronda Leia

151-Assistant Special Education Director

$139,018.80

Etheridge, Steven

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

$133,921.00

Thompson, Todd A

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

$124,234.61

Casey, Stephanie M

127-Head of Gen Ed (Department chair no admin

$120,725.00

 

Total

$1,711,038.55

One Final Chart


This final chart examines the administration team between 2021 and the end of 2025. Since 2021, budgets have grown and salaries have gone up, so this is not an apples to apples comparison -- but does give a sense of the growth in administration that is reflected in the data on FTE. We see 2 positions winding down/eliminated and the addition of 5 new positions including a Deputy Superintendent, an additional Administrator in Bilingual Education, and more General Administration Roles. The growth in this area reflects $614k in additional spending in administration, however this should be adjusted down to account for natural increases in salary over 4 years - so $500k may be a more reasonable figure for additional spending.

2021 Position

Base Salary

Title

2025 Position

Base Salary

Additional $

LAWRENCE, REGINALD L

$184,800.00

100-District Superintendent

WILLIAMS, SHARON DENISE

$220,846.15

$36,046.15

SIERRASANDERS, ALICIA A

$139,184.50

152-Special Education Director

SIERRASANDERS, ALICIA A

$167,092.00

$27,907.50

DIXON, RAMONA B

$130,895.30

107-General Administrat

DIXON, RAMONA B

$159,947.00

$29,051.70

N/A

$0.00

121-Administrator in a Bilingual Education

FRANTZ, DEBRA LYNN

$158,368.00

$158,368.00

RUGGEBERG, MARY KATHRYN

$152,672.85

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

VANCE, WILLIAM SCOTT

$156,054.89

$3,382.04

N/A

$0.00

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

DASE, JEFFREY

$154,778.00

$154,778.00

WILLIAMS, LASHANTA

$113,549.10

121-Administrator in a Bilingual Education

WILLIAMS, LASHANTA

$147,860.00

$34,310.90

LILLIS, MICHELLE LEANNE

$112,574.65

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

ALLEN, KRISTIN A

$147,860.00

$35,285.35

OSWALD, MELODY G

$100,664.08

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

CLARK, LANCE ROBERT

$147,860.00

$47,195.92

N/A

 $0

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

MAAG, DORIAN DAWN

$141,475.00

$141,475.00

N/A

$0

107-General Administrator or General Supervisor

ANDEDO, LORELEI ROCHELLE

$120,005.00

$120,005.00

N/A

$0.00

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

MOORE, DOMINIQUE P

$106,168.65

$106,168.65

COLBRESE, EGAN M

$152,672.85

101-Assistant/Associate District Superintendent

COLBRESE, EGAN M

$26,333.38

$126,339.47

BECKWITH, ROBERT D

$152,672.85

114-Chief School Business Official

N/A

$0.00

$152,672.85





TOTAL

$614,961.89

Conclusion


Looking closely at how school districts allocate resources is important. The way dollars are distributed—between instruction, student services, operations, and administration—can shape the daily experience of students and staff. For that reason, it is reasonable for communities to ask questions about how their schools are staffed and how budgets are structured.


Based on the financial and staffing data reviewed here, however, the narrative that administrative expansion is harming classroom instruction in Rock Island is not supported by the available evidence.


Over the past seven years, the number of administrative positions in the district has increased only slightly—by four full-time equivalent positions. During the same period, instructional staffing declined modestly while student services and support staff positions increased. These changes suggest that staffing growth has occurred primarily in areas connected to student support and school operations rather than central administration.


Compensation patterns also provide context. Administrative salaries in Rock Island are, on average, somewhat higher than those in Moline—by roughly $50,000—though Moline maintains a larger administrative team overall. Teacher salaries in Rock Island average about $2,000 less than in Moline. At the same time, Moline spends more overall on IMRF-covered professional staff, indicating that some differences between the districts may reflect how positions are categorized and coded rather than fundamentally different staffing priorities.


While the data reviewed here does not suggest that administrative growth is diverting significant resources away from students, it remains important to monitor these trends over time. Many communities prefer to see the largest share of educational resources directed toward classroom instruction and direct student support, and maintaining transparency around staffing and compensation helps ensure those priorities remain visible.


My hope is that this analysis can serve as a starting point—a baseline for understanding how Rock Island’s schools are structured today. Moving forward, Rock Island Line will aim to revisit these figures periodically so the community can continue to engage with how school funding decisions may shape the student experience.


In the next article in this series, I will turn to other factors that may influence school climate and student behavior, including student supports, discipline policy, and broader trends affecting schools across the country.


Sources:







Comments


A CREATIVE COMMUNITY MEDIA PROJECT

PERMISSION TO USE ROCK ISLAND LINE GIVEN BY ROCK ISLAND RAIL

bottom of page